Feminism & Women’s Logic

Women are a huge fucking shit test for men because they make no sense, at all, even to themselves. They have a tendency to act first and rationalise later, women thrive fundamentally on spontaneity. Women are the quintessential example of what constitutes irrationalism, poor logic and a propensity to think with feelings rather than material facts. It’s this fundamental lack of rationality that creates the outward impression that women aren’t very credible people seeing as generally speaking, there is little consistent reasoning to their behaviours. Most women are not very self-aware, especially younger women, they live in the moment, they are easily swayed and they jump from one emotional impulse to the next.

They hate to take responsibility, they hate to admit to faults, they’re so allergic to being wrong or being exposed in some negative way that rather commonly they’ll emotionally lash out, either at you or whoever is close by and seems like a suitable scapegoat in order to cover their own asses, even when what is being said is either truthful or reasonable. Women inherently value their own sense of well-being above reality and truth, justice doesn’t factor into the equation unless she personally feels indignant about the dispute at hand.

Funnily enough, if you explained and presented to a woman her illogical behaviour and circumspect decisions but instead of framing it as being part of her own behaviour you instead told her they were the actions of another woman, she’d concur with you that this behaviour was wholly irrational. It’s when you apply those same facts to her, she immediately begins to feel judged and then starts shutting down, when you direct the truth at the woman involved she can’t mentally handle the manifestation of her own inadequacy, it makes her feel uneasy and she will do anything to escape that sensation, so what does she do? Out of mental self-preservation she dissociates from reality and rejects the truth using flawed reasoning and stubbornness to alleviate her discomfort.

Feminism does not have a strong logical basis, its followers are typically not rational in nature, advocates of feminism have pavlovs dog type responses to anti-feminism, or, if that word offends one’s sensibilities, we can call it “a systematic critique of feminisms weaknesses” or “the negative effects of feminism” simply put, as far as feminists are concerned, the ideology they choose to identify with most strongly and live their life by can do no wrong, it delivered the poor women to salvation where once they were traumatically and mercilessly oppressed by the cold calculating hands of a vindictive sociopathic patriarchy!!!…. yeah right.

This kind of thinking is incredibly synonymous with the close-minded sentiment that religious extremists and devout followers express, a lack of impartiality, be it due to a lack of ability or simply a lack of desire to see objectively both the strengths and weaknesses of something, because that something is something they hold dear to them, something they personally identify with on a deeper level, and to shatter that perception is to shatter a part of who they are – something that deeply troubles them. That’s why feminism thrives, to its followers it can do no wrong – it is the apple of their eye as it is nestled comfortably in the core of what comprises their sense of self.

An example of this is a piece I wrote about the negative effects that feminism has had on the family unit, I looked at how feminism directly contributes to messing up children, increasing a child’s chances of living in poverty, increasing a child’s chances of committing crime and even how feminism and its effect on the family unit affects the educational attainment of children from single parent families, however the women and men which adhere to feminism simply don’t care about these harsh realities, even with the statistics, studies and journals to back it up. Do you know how these people can insanely ignore such perversity despite claiming to be all about social justice? Because they’re not using logic or reason.

Their entire argument/point of view is emotional and subjective by its very nature. “Women were always oppressed therefore – feminism!” “we need feminism because women are equal to men but unequal without it” this is quite ironic as this basically translates into logical talk as: women are inferior to men and need a government sanctioned ideology to achieve a perverse form of equality which redistributes privilege and wealth to women but frames this redistribution of social privilege and resource management as “independence.” If you tell feminists about the inequality men experience, they bigotedly disregard it, if this woman is even remotely representative of what constitutes a modern-day feminist you can see that they tend to have an obnoxiously elitist disregard for MRAs and give no fucks at all about mens inherent lack of rights/privileges in important areas of modern-day society.

Typically a feminist will address any form of male experienced inequality with dissatisfaction or disbelief, disregarding it with some idiotic statement such as: “well that’s not as bad as getting raped” as if they’re under this incredible sense of perverted delusion that you can justify an inequality by saying there’s a worser type of crime/inequality out there and therefore, hey, fuck this other type of inequality because it’s not the worst one in existence! It’s horrendous reasoning, truly; and this silly fallacious logic has even reached the family courts, to the point where a man can be arrested for a woman’s change of mind.

Example: I was in court in my country (England) the other day, I was watching from the side and a woman had got a restraining order put out against a man who had fathered a little boy with her, meaning that he was not legally allowed to visit her or see his son. The hearing was in the lowest court of the land, the Magistrates Court and the man had brought a solicitor along with him to put his case forward.

What had happened was that despite no history of violence, the court awarded the mother a restraining order against the father of the child back in 2010, per her request – the reasons for the original order being granted were not stated. The man had not seen his child since November 2010. The mother (the “victim”) randomly got in contact with the father again earlier this year (2013) welcoming him back into her life. Yes, the supposed victim was welcoming back the supposed “bad guy” into her and their child’s life.

The father spent two months living with the mother, raising his little boy with the mother until she decided that she did not want the father anymore and kicked him out on to the street. Distraught, as he had been building a bond with his son over the two months he had been living with the mother, he sent the mother of his son some non-violent text messages asking when he could see his son again, the mother ignored him and rather manipulatively presented the texts to the court as evidence of harassment. Without her verbal consent to be in contact (as she had rescinded her consent for him to see his son as casually as she had invited him back into her life) he was in violation of the restraining order issued by the court in 2010 (contacting someone via text message who has a restraining order out against you is in direct violation of the restraining order.)

The court clerk (a woman, no doubt) convinced the 3 magistrates presiding that they did not have sufficient powers to deal with the case (maximum sentence in a Magistrates Court is 6 months imprisonment) so the case was moved up to the County Court and will be heard at a later date in a higher court where a more serious penalty can be awarded. Does more than 6 months in prison for violating a restraining order with two text messages sound like justice to you? Does that sound fair? Does this man deserve to have the right removed to see his own flesh and blood? Does the child, a 7-year-old little boy too innocent to know of the perversities of reality deserve to grow up without a father because quite simply his mother is confused, irrational and possibly spiteful? No, not at all. The court doesn’t care, the feminists don’t care – women hold all the cards, the child nor the man has any say in the matter at hand here.

In terms of inequality, the fact of the matter is, men have always played dominant above women, men built this planet, they made most of the discoveries, built most of the institutions, the technology, philosophy, every extravagant splendour you can imagine – most were envisioned, imagined, built, crafted, manifested and delivered by men. If women were so great and so on par with men it isn’t too much of a long shot to deduce they would have played a much more active part in the socio-evolutionary process, instead they reared children and kept house – they played logistics/nurturer, supporting man so he could fight to live another day.

Feminists argue women were held down, but if women were equal to men then how could they be held down by men? Violence you say? Then they weren’t equal were they? They were weaker in a fundamentally limiting aspect, they were lower in the social hierarchy by merit of their own ineptitude. True inherent (and not socially constructed) equality would suggest that men would be insufficient to enact such a penalty, if you have two equal parties, one cannot overpower the other in a stalemate situation, this is assuming the preposterous notion that all men were abusive oppressive women beaters, which is a simply hilariously bigotedly close-minded belief to hold about human history, however it’s not something which is far off from what the average feminist has been taught to believe.

The reality is, for most of human history it was accepted that the gender roles assigned to men and women were efficient and benefited the species in being structured in that way, that’s it – there’s no evil “patriarchal entity” systematically enslaving womankind. Feminism continues to ignore the achievements of man and focuses on the lack of achievements of women, blaming men for this paradigm rather than appreciating men for their continued sacrifice and dedication to improving the human condition – as I said at the start, it’s an incredibly biased and one-sided group of people who have no room or tolerance in their worldview to see feminism criticised in the even most slightest of negative contexts.

There is power with dominance, this is what a lot of the extremist feminists saw and idolised, power “but with all power comes great responsibility” there is a heck of a lot more expectation and responsibility that comes with power, as addictive as power is to humans – there’s a price to pay for having it. It’s quite funny really because even in western nations people are brainwashed to say men and women are equal, but then people always expect more and better from a man, even women themselves do. It’s like an invisible sense of cognitive dissonance which permeates the social fabric.

People rely on men, they lean on men, depend on men and burden men with their emotions and what appreciation do men get? Fuck all. It’s an obligation, an expectation, not a favour – you don’t get a pat on the back for expectations “you’re a man, that’s what men do.” and hey if you’re not deemed superior enough to be a man you will be hit with some textbook shaming “grow a pair” “man up” etc. It’s funny that feminists use these insults at all, actually, because it infers subliminally that masculinity is inherently superior to femininity by holding men to a higher standard of which they do not hold women to, I’m sure of course this irony is totally and utterly lost on them, as delicious as it is to identify.

Men get vilified, they’re painted as the bad guys and it’s safe to openly disrespect them without anyone screaming “misandry!” – it is a perverse civilization, one that has always been and is wholly dependent on men, yet fails to appreciate them as a group for their combined contribution to human betterment. Women today are like children who were spoiled too much, you give them the world, you keep giving them rights, you keep supplicating to their whims, you give in to all their demands and what do they do? In their own privacy they fantasize to 50 shades of grey, vigorously masturbating the shit out of their clitoris’ whilst conversely talking shit about men and their negative nature during the day in the public sphere, the very same thing that they’re getting off too when it’s put on steroids in an erotic novel. Wow, that irony there, again, I think the modern woman’s sense of ironic contradiction is completely invisible to her, if you ever needed “proof” women aren’t logical, that generalisation would do a lot to enlighten you.

Women don’t respect men “for who they are”, they objectify them as success objects, they respect a man’s power as it indicates his ability to be successful, not his character but his power. If as a man you become too weak,  a woman will leave you –  and leave you to rot she will. The expectation is that you will be better than her, stronger than her – by nature of hypergamy as if you are not, she simply does not find you attractive. It’s for this reason alone the sheer notion of equality, in all pragmatism is not only deluded but completely incompatible with human sexual attraction. A woman’s loyalty is tied directly to her man’s power, not his character. No power = no attraction.

Example of power: you’re a manager at a store, sure you can fire people/get paid more, but you also have to make sure everyone is OK, comply with regulations, everyone comes to you if there is a problem etc. Woman’s inherent ineptitude to reason makes them bad at these kinds of jobs, the best women make great support roles, there’s a few outliers who can lead well, but generally as a demographic they are simply not cut out for leadership. Their inclination is to burden their staff with their responsibilities by moaning (which creates a bad leadership image), they blame-shift their faults onto others and of course they delegate their own responsibilities to others, generally, to men – expecting them to pick up the slack. Women are just not very good with pressure, they panic and they dramatise and ironically, you’ll find this funny, if you were to say this to them it would elicit a sense of panic and drama, one that touches the essence of her ego for making her aware that she is utterly incompetent in such a manner. Through sheer indoctrination and modern female narcissism, this repeatedly observed phenomena, a widely observed truth, would be disregarded and decried. Hilarious.

I like women a lot, I do, I value their strange quality of seeming almost in the moment, almost innocent in their lack of ability to reason even despite their all too common and incredible capability to effortlessly manipulate and inflict mental pain upon people, it is something I can never be or experience because I am far too logical in my disposition and thus it presents a certain element of mystical esotericism to me – it is truly fascinating. However feminism corrupts the feminine sensibilities and sells them the lie that men are inherently bad people and that they as a group, women, should be wary of the group known as men. Women swallow this bullshit up, fearful as they are.

Women are stupid, brainwashed and emotional enough to believe this bile, internalise it and regurgitate it “patriarchy!!!!” before you know it’ll turn out Santa Claus was real, oh please. Men who were brought up by women or otherwise raised in a feminist environment get brainwashed too, they’re derogatively referred to as manginas, they’re bumbling estrogen fuelled apologists with a cognitively unhealthy level of self-hatred which manifests as this perverse need to supplicate to the contemporary feminine social identity. It’s sad. Feminism does fuck all positive for society anymore, civil rights were about the only positive thing to come out of feminism.

I perceive modern-day feminism as a form of gender segregation, it’s like when the whites and the blacks sat on different sections of the bus in slavery, now you find women sticking with women, men sticking with men and apart from when everyone is drunk and seeking sex, the two groups barely mingle – their opinions of each other are bad, gender relations are strained and some people are opting out completely, just giving up on the other sex entirely.

It’s for that reason I’d encourage my fellow-men disenfranchised with the current state of women and their indoctrinated feminist influence to seek out more fruitful friendships with other men and focus on themselves, rather than focus on the pursuit of attaining or impressing women. Sure you have sexual needs, none of us can help that – but placing so much of your happiness in the hands of an “idealistic woman” a gentle woman, a kind woman, a non-vapid, intelligent, cerebral, wise woman – a type of woman who has been culled en masse by the brusque, curt hands of feminism will only seek to damage one’s health mentally and bring forth great pain, what you seek is a unicorn and unicorns are a mythological specie of animal, there’s simply not enough to go around.

We all deserve better than this feminist bullshit our forefathers have left us to deal with, but we deal with the hand we’ve got and live the best way that we can. That’s a core tenet of the red pill philosophy, be the best man you can be – don’t give in, do not relent. Constantly work on yourself.

Don’t give in, find pride in yourself through both your heritage and your potential to be better – actualise your potential, swimming in feminist ideology will just destroy you. Feminism is something you need to be aware of as it’s so entrenched in western societies, but it’s like a sickness and red pill philosophy is the antibiotic to get it out of your disease-ridden system, a strong dose of reality to slap all that propaganda out of one’s indoctrinated head.

Acknowledge feminism, understand it, analyse its perverse nature, accept it’s not going to disappear anytime soon – but reject its message. You can’t change it so you must co-exist alongside it without believing in it, just like people of different religions in secular countries live side-by-side worshipping different gods without believing in each others religions relatively peacefully, you must live side-by-side with feminists, not buying into a single iota of their babbling shit.

If you can do this you can find some semblance of happiness. Best of luck to my fellow brothers who have been unjustly wronged by this corrupt and perverse social system we’ve inherited.

---

You can support IM's work by purchasing his audiobook or subscribing on Patreon